Posts tagged "arbitration litigation mediation"

Arbitration Litigation

arbitration litigation
For whom would litigation be most advantagous and least advantagous in resolving a dispute and why?

As opposed to other forms of dispute reolution such as mediation and arbitration who would benefit the most from litigation and who would be disadvantaged by it and could you please provide some reasoning?

Litigation is most advantageous for those who are trying to set policy by it.

For instance, an insurance company may want to establish a public perception that it will take cases to trial unless litigants against it settle for low amount the company wants to offer.

That perception will encourage litigants to settle for the low amounts, thus saving it money over the long haul, even if it does lose a few cases along the way.

What are the principal differences between mediation, arbitration and litigation?

If You Are A Party To An Agreement With An Arbitration Clause

Arbitration is not presumed.  Parties are not held to have forfeited their right to a trial unless they clearly have agreed to substitute an arbitration proceeding.  If the parties clearly agree to substitute an arbitration for the determination of particular issues, a court will generally enforce their agreement and compel arbitration of those issues.

But not always . . .

In a recent appeal the Appellate Division of the Superior Court reviewed a case that involved a lease commission agreement between plaintiff and defendant.  The agreement clearly provided that disputes between the parties were to be arbitrated.

After having managed the case for five years, the trial court– on its own–determined that arbitration was appropriate and required the parties to arbitrate the dispute in accordance with their agreement.

Neither party appealed from the order requiring arbitration.  Both participated in a lengthy arbitration.  The arbitrator awarded plaintiff more than $1,000,000.

The trial court confirmed the award and defendant appealed.

YOU BE THE JUDGE:  Can parties to a contract waive a provision that clearly provides for arbitration of disputes?

The Appellate Division vacated the arbitration award.  The Court held that parties to a clear contract agreement to arbitrate can waive that contract right by their conduct.
It concluded that the trial court had erred in compelling arbitration because the parties had waived the right to arbitrate by having engaged in litigation instead for many years.

The decision points out that a courtroom can bring justice and may be the only way to protect your rights. We know courtrooms; we have harnessed the power of the law in courtrooms to bring justice for our clients for decades. Please contact us to discuss how we can help you in a new lawsuit or provide a “second opinion” about your pending lawsuit. There is no obligation for the initial consultation.

The New Jersey Law Firm and its attorneys are dedicated to client-driven results and protecting individual rights and business interests. For 40 years, the Law Firm has been recognized for sound legal judgment, immigration laws, real estate cases, litigation, contracts and advocacy in serving the transactional needs of both individual and business clients. If you need assistance with business or corporate formation and operations, or you seek legal advice about insurance defense, arbitrations, wrongful termination, environmental issues, bankruptcy, insurance, civil rights and other litigation alternatives, the Law Firm has the comprehensive experience, foresight, skills and talent to assist you to safeguard your assets, interest and investments. The New Jersey Law Firm’s highly devoted, motivated, experienced, skilled lawyers/attorneys and effective legal professionals are always there to assist you.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by admin - March 31, 2009 at 6:58 am

Categories: Litigation   Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Arbitration Litigation Mediation

arbitration litigation mediation

Academic Writing – Mediation And Consultation

In the Academic Writing about Trust Walk here we will be discussing about conflict resolution

Role of Mediation, consultation and facilitation throughout conflict resolution

Conflict resolution is a range of processes aimed at alleviating or eliminating sources of conflict. The term “conflict resolution” is sometimes used interchangeably with the term dispute resolution or alternative dispute resolution. Processes of conflict resolution generally include negotiation, mediation and diplomacy. The processes of arbitration, litigation, and formal complaint processes such as ombudsman processes, are usually described with the term dispute resolution, although some refer to them as “conflict resolution.” Processes of mediation and arbitration are often referred to as alternative dispute resolution.

Mediation, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or “appropriate dispute resolution”, aims to assist two (or more) disputants in reaching an agreement. The parties themselves determine the conditions of any settlements reached— rather than accepting something imposed by a third party. The disputes may involve (as parties) states, organizations, communities, individuals or other representatives with a vested interest in the outcome.

Mediators use appropriate techniques and/or skills to open and/or improve dialogue between disputants, aiming to help the parties reach an agreement (with concrete effects) on the disputed matter. Normally, all parties must view the mediator as impartial.

Disputants may use mediation in a variety of disputes, such as commercial, legal, diplomatic, workplace, community and family matters.

A third-party representative may contract and mediate between (say) unions and corporations. When a workers’ union goes on strike, a dispute takes place, and the corporation hires a third party to intervene in attempt to settle a contract or agreement between the union and the corporation.

Mediation is a very usual tool, adaptable to anticipate problems, grievances and difficulties between parties before the conflict may arise. This has potential applications in large and private sector organizations, particularly where they are subject to excessive change, competition and economic pressure. A key way mediation is used to prevent these conflicts is complaint handling and management. This is a conflict prevention mechanism designed to handle a complaint effectively at first contact and to minimize the possibility of it developing into a dispute. According to Charlton a person who undertakes this role is commonly known as a “dispute preventer”.

Consultation- Consultation refers to providing guidelines and finding out ways to solve a particular discrepancy. Consultation is a regulatory process by which the public’s input on matters affecting them is sought. Its main goals are in improving the efficiency, transparency[1] and public involvement in large-scale projects or laws and policies.

Facilitation- Facilitation refers to the process of designing and running a successful meeting.

Facilitation concerns itself with all the tasks needed to run a productive and impartial meeting. Facilitation serves the needs of any group who are meeting with a common purpose, whether it be making a decision, solving a problem, or simply exchanging ideas and information. It does not lead the group, nor does it try to distract or to entertain.

The roles of facilitator are as follows-

- monitors the agenda

 – keep time

 – manage the group process

 -encourage participation from all attendees

 – help participants understand different points of view

 – foster solutions that incorporate diverse points of view

 – manage participant behavior

 – create a safe environment

 – teach new thinking skills and facilitating structured thinking activities

arbitration litigation mediation
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
In 2009, President Obama signed into law the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (“FERA”). The FCA had a relatively narrow “reverse false claims” provision prior to FERA, but FERA expanded the potential for liability for reverse false claims. 2 It made liable a person who “knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the …

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by admin - August 19, 2007 at 1:39 pm

Categories: Litigation   Tags: , , , , ,