Posts Tagged ‘dallas’

Dallas Litigation Firms

dallas litigation firms

Critiquing Texas Appraisal Review Boards

Critiquing Texas Appraisal Review Boards

 

Presented to Texas Association of Property Tax Professionals

 

By Paul Pennington

 

Appraisal Districts and Appraisal Review Boards (ARBs) should be acutely sensitive of the public perception of their distinct and separate functions.  The Appraisal Review Board Manual promulgated by the Texas Comptroller’s Office which is used as a training tool for ARB members tells us “…The ARB is a quasi-judicial entity with the responsibility to resolve disputes between property owners and appraisal districts.  The ARB is a separate entity from the appraisal district and serves a different function.â€Â  Unfortunately, many property owners, some in The Texas Legislature, and independent property tax professionals, do not see the ARB in that light.  They view ARBs as an extension of the appraisal districts, fraught with bias and not independent.  There is always room within the Texas Property Tax System to refine and improve and the ARBs are no exception.  Some professionals would prefer a system where the appraisal district and appraisal review boards were physically separated to insure impartiality.  The concept on the surface seems to be one which any reasoned person could not argue with. However, upon closer examination there are issues which arise relating to cost, administration and logistics which suggest the separation of the ARB may not be practical in all cases.   That doesn’t mean constructive criticism couldn’t improve the Texas ARB system.

 

What contributes to the ARBs apparent appearance as an institution overly influenced by appraisal districts?  What could be done to correct current perception?

 

Appraisal Review Board (ARB) member selection process:

 

• Board members are selected by the Board of Directors of the appraisal district.

 

To insure impartiality the selection of ARB members should be taken out of the hands of the appraisal district board of directors.  This notion has been previously discussed.  This year the Texas Legislature passed HB 1030 which, among other things, provides that in Harris and Fort Bend Counties, “ARB members are appointed by the local administrative judgeâ€. 

 

• Others might argue that anyone other than the appraisal district board of directors might bring local politics into the current system.

 

 

Who compensates ARB members?

 

• Board members are generally paid by the day and reimbursed for expenses. The appraisal district directors set the amount of payment in the budget. However, some appraisal districts do not budget to reimburse ARB members for their expenses.

 

• Consider:  Human nature would suggest impartiality is affected when ARB members receive compensation from the appraisal district.   Therefore board members should not be compensated by appraisal districts.

 

 

 Who can serve on an ARB?

 

• If you lived in the county for at least two years before becoming a member.

 

• No special qualifications required.

 

 

• Property tax professionals recognize the difficulty of recruiting citizens to serve.  Thus a large number of ARB members consist of retired individuals from various fields.  Counties should consider increased compensation for qualified members serving on the ARB.

 

Who can not serve?

 

• A current appraisal district director;

 

• A current employee or chief appraiser of the appraisal district;

 

• A current board member, employee or officer of a taxing unit served by the appraisal district; or

 

• A current employee of the Comptroller of Public Accounts.

 

Appraisal districts with a population of 100,000 or more, the following restrictions apply:

 

• You served for all or part of three previous terms as a board member or an auxiliary board member on the ARB;

 

• You were a former appraisal district director;

 

• You were a former employee or former officer of the appraisal district;

 

• You appeared before the ARB for compensation; or

 

 

• Until the fourth anniversary of the date you ceased to serve as a member or officer of a taxing unit for which the appraisal district appraises property.

 

• Consider using property tax professionals (property tax consultants, attorneys, corporate tax agents, etc.) as potential ARB members after the fourth anniversary of the date they cease ARB appearances for compensation. 

 

How is an ARB member removed?

 

• Under certain circumstances, appraisal district directors may remove board members by majority vote.

 

• Consider removing this authority of the appraisal district directors.

 

Who trains ARB members?

 

• The appraisal district trains the board and the Texas Comptroller’s Office produces a manual which is also used as a training tool.

 

• The appraisal district should not be involved in the training of the ARB.

 

• In 2009 the legislature passed HB 2317;â€â€¦ which provides a training curriculum for ARB members and requires that it be completed.â€

 

 

Where is an ARB located?

 

• Generally, an ARB may reside in any office it chooses, limited only by its budgetary constraints. Most ARBs meet at the appraisal district office.

 

• To insure that the ARB is perceived as an independent entity, they should be separate and distinct from the appraisal districts.  Obviously this might not be practical with most appraisal districts.  In fact the concept may only be practical for the five largest appraisal districts (The Big 5).

 

Why separate the ARB from the appraisal district?

 

• Property owners and tax professionals perceive the ARB as an extension of the appraisal district and not as a separate independent and impartial entity. 

 

What are the Pro’s and Con’s of the physical separation of the ARB and Appraisal District?

 

• Con: Appraisal Districts could argue that the concept of separation is cost prohibitive.  Issues such as staffing, rent, fixed assets, salaries, etc. would make the idea of “separation†a non-starter or would it?

 

• The chart listed below shows the 2010 budgets for the “Big 5 Appraisal Districts†(Bexar, Dallas, Harris, Tarrant and Travis Counties).

 

Appraisal   District

2010 Budget

Total Parcels

Number of Employees

ARB Budget 2010

Legal Services  Budget 2010

Dallas Central Appraisal District

$21,799,127

815,894

245

$626,027

$1,348,740

Harris Central Appraisal District

$63,899,143

1,556,703

640

$2,450,000

$6,000,000

Tarrant Appraisal District

$19,333,419

681,533

205

$617,599

 

  $1,099,250

Bexar Appraisal District

$14,278,245

626,094

157

$577,000

$492,000

Travis Central Appraisal District

$11,930,670

393,109

122

$526,470

$750,000

 

• Con: For example The Dallas Central Appraisal District (DCAD) spends roughly $2,000,000 on their ARB and legal services.  So, the question is what would the cost of an independent DCAD ARB be versus the current system?  The argument could be made that the number of lawsuits theoretically would be reduced with a revamped ARB system.  If the DCAD’s Legal Services Budget were reduced due to less litigation would it be sufficient to cover the cost of an ARB located outside the premises or would it at least be revenue neutral?  Some could argue that, with all things considered, separation would cost more than the current DCAD ARB system.  Further, no one would expect the number of lawsuits to drop to zero even with significant changes to the ARB. 

 

• Pro: The Harris County Appraisal District’s (HCAD) 2010 ARB and Legal Services Budget is set at $8,450,000.  With all things considered can anyone make a valid argument that it would not be cost effective to separate the ARB from HCAD?  These figures suggest that an argument to the contrary would be difficult to make.  Even if one becomes the devil’s advocate and blames HCAD’s excessive ARB and legal services budget on property tax consulting firms who historically file massive numbers of appeals and litigation.   The HCAD 2010 budgeted figures lose creditability due to the recent actions of the Texas Legislature (HB 2591 (1) and Texas Attorney General’s Office designed to reign in such disruptive and unwarranted appeals by owners agents.

 

(1)HB 2591 deals property tax consultants educational requirements and “enumerates prohibited acts.â€

 

• Con:  Appraisal districts are under pressure to keep values high to be in compliance with the Comptroller’s school district property value study (2).   A truly independent ARB could jeopardize the appraisal district’s outcome on the Comptroller’s study.  This year the legislature passed HB 8 which created new guidelines for the study.  Namely the study will become “biennial — rather than annual.â€Â  During the off year the Comptroller’s office will be auditing the appraisal district’s methods, procedures, governance and taxpayer assistance.   

 

• Con: Separation could lengthen the appeal process thus tax rolls might not be certified on a timely basis.  This argument implies that there are efficiencies created with the ARB and appraisal district being located in the same building.

 

• Pro:  Technology could allow the process to run at the same pace even with separation facilities.

 

• Pro:  The over-riding logic for ARB separation is not an issue of cost but it is to insure impartiality of board members.

 

The Texas Comptroller’s Office Appraisal Review Board Manual explains that “….the ARB may need the services of an attorney.  The ARB may hire its own attorney if the appraisal district budget provides funds for one.  If not, the ARB may use the services of the county attorney.â€

 

• Consideration should be given to require the ARB to use the services of the county attorney or use other legal services of a firm not contracting with the appraisal district.  The ARB should have access to independent counsel and legal opinions.

 

 

 

 

 

(2) § 5.10. RATIO STUDIES.  (a) The comptroller shall conduct an annual study in each appraisal district to determine the degree of uniformity of and the median level of appraisals by the appraisal district within each major category of property.  The comptroller shall publish a report of the findings of the study, including in the report the median levels of appraisal for each major category of property, the coefficient of dispersion around the median level of appraisal for each major category of property, and any other standard statistical measures that the comptroller considers appropriate.  In conducting the study, the comptroller shall apply appropriate standard statistical analysis techniques to data collected as part of the annual study of school district taxable values required by Section 403.302, Government Code.

The ARB Process:

 

Listed below are the seven steps of the ARB system during a typical tax year:

 

• Chief appraiser submits records to the ARB

 

• ARB hears taxing unit challenge

 

• ARB hears taxpayer’s protests

 

• ARB issues Orders Determining Protests

 

• ARB approve appraisal records

 

• Chief appraiser certifies tax roll to taxing entities

 

• Corrections after tax roll approval

 

 

For the purpose of this critique I will limit my comments specifically to issues relating to the ARB hearing taxpayers protests.

 

• ARB Hearing procedures

 

This year the legislature passed SB 771 which, among other things, increased “the penalty for ex parte communications between a CAD (county appraisal district) and ARB members.â€

 

• Evidence / Burden of Proof: 

 

•  
  • The appraisal district must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that their value is correct.
  • Hearsay testimony is not allowed.
  • The appraisal district has the burden of proof.

 

• Witnesses:
  • Anyone may appear as a witness
  • Expert witnesses

 

• Appraiser testimony and evidence: 

 

•  
  • The Comptroller’s Office describes staff testimony as an informed opinion not necessarily verifiable fact.

 

• Subpoenas:

 

•  
  • The ARB has the power to subpoena witnesses, books, records or other documents.
  • Abuses of this power have occurred.

 

• Postponement of a hearing: 

 

•  
  • The ARB must postpone a hearing if the property owner or owner’s agent is previously scheduled for an ARB hearing in another appraisal district.

 

• ARBs should schedule the out of town taxpayer or the owner’s agent hearings at one time.  These would be obvious convenience, financial and time management factors.

 

• Mass appraisal:

 

•  
  • Establishes market value on real and business personal property.

 

•  
  • Appraisal districts must comply with Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practices (USPAP).

 

• Three approaches to value:

 

•  
  • Cost
  • Income capitalization
  • Sales Comparison
  • ARB members should be familiar with the three approaches to value and be able to make reasoned conclusions based on this knowledge.  Additionally, they need to have a solid grasp of their local economies.

 

• Unequal appraisal: The Texas Property Tax Code states the following in Section 41.43  Protest of Determination of Value or Inequality of Appraisal

 

(b) A protest on the grounds of unequal appraisal of property shall be determined in favor of the protesting party unless the appraisal district establishes that:

(1) the appraisal ratio of the property is equal to or less than the median level of appraisal of a reasonable and representative sample of other properties in the appraisal district;

(2) the appraisal ratio of the property is equal to or less than the median level of appraisal of a sample of properties in the appraisal district consisting of a reasonable number of other properties similarly situated to, or of the same general kind of character as, the property subject to the protest; or

(3) the appraised value of the property is equal to or less than the median appraised value of a reasonable number of comparable properties appropriately adjusted. 

 

•  
  • The genesis of many property tax lawsuits is the failure of the ARB’s to significantly address these three tests of unequal appraisal appeals.  The concept of inequality of appraisal is a fluid process which begins when the notices of valuations are mailed in May and or posted on the appraisal district website and continues through the administrative remedy.   The ARB should examine the valuations of like properties “in real time†during the ARB process and make reasoned rulings based on evidence.

 

 

• Appraisal districts use high-tech media presentations to present their case and the taxpayer and/or agent is limited to verbal testimony and hard copy evidence.

 

• It is inherently wrong that the appraisal district controls all media devices during an ARB hearing.  For example some appraisal districts have internet access in the ARB hearing rooms.  During the hearings they have the ability to access on-line sales and rental information during the hearing.  Taxpayers and/or their agents should have access to any media tools used by the appraisal district staff during a hearing or the right to bring their own equipment.

 

 

1. These measures will vastly improve the perception the public, the legislature and owners’ agents currently have of the Texas ARB system.

Wick Phillips Adds to Its Bankruptcy and Litigation Practice Groups
DALLAS—-Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP, a full-service business law firm, is expanding its bankruptcy and litigation practice groups with the hire of Jonathan Covin, a bankruptcy, restructuring, and creditors’ rights specialist.

Incoming search terms for the article:

• Texas Divorce sample Litigation Hold

Dallas Litigation Attorney

dallas litigation attorney
Kendall Law Group Investigates Lance, Inc. Merger for Shareholders
DALLAS—-Kendall Law Group, led by a former federal judge and a former U.S. Attorney, is investigating Lance, Inc. for shareholders in connection with the proposed merger with Snyder’s.
Business Lawyers – Litigation Attorney – Austin – Dallas – Plano – Round Rock

How to Resolve Dallas Family Law Matters Peacefully and Quickly

How to Resolve Dallas Family Law Matters Peacefully and Quickly

Resolving family law disputes related to divorce, child custody, child protective services, adoption and the like is not easy. Amicable and mutually agreeable resolution of family disputes requires adequate legal knowledge and experience of Dallas family law.. If you are caught up in a family law matter, it is crucial to avail the services of a first-class Dallas family attorney or law firm.

A reputable Dallas family attorney will have thorough knowledge of the legal proceedings that are part of family law. In the capacity of a legal representative, a Dallas family lawyer would help you prepare and submit the necessary legal documents required in the Dallas court, build your case, present it before the judiciary body and achieve a desirable resolution.

Professional and experienced Dallas family firms provide sound legal representation in all types of family law matters. In the case of divorce, your divorce attorney would help you deal with all the issues related to divorce, such as characterization and valuation of marital assets, property division, reimbursement claims, spousal support, child custody and issuance of restraining orders.

Leading Dallas divorce lawyers are trained in all family law approaches namely courtroom litigation, collaborative divorce law, and mediation. Divorce matters are resolved mostly by the parties’ voluntary agreement, through the assistance of a mediator, and at times after a court trial.

Other family law matters resolved by reputable Dallas family lawyers include:

Child custody disputes, including emergency restraining orders, parenting plan development, custody trials, child support and visitation orders, and modification of pre-existing custody and support orders.
Rights of grandparents and extended family members, including advocation for any family members who may have rights to visitation or custody.
Child Protective Services cases, including defence of claims for child abuse or neglect, appeal of CPS abuse findings, home study disputes, foster parent interventions, foster home placement disputes and termination of parental rights defense.
Adoption, including adoptions by step-parents and extended family, agreed adoptions, relinquishment of parental rights and open adoptions.

To take the example of child protective services, if you need to protect your child and yourself from CPS investigation, seek the services of a reputable CPS attorney at a well-regarded Dallas family law firm. Such lawyers have a thorough understanding of the CPS system and know how to create a balance between the interest of CPS workers who are striving for the safety of the child and that of the parents who wish to maintain custody of their offspring.

Schreier & Housewirth is a leading Fort Worth family law firm with over 35 years of experience in Dallas divorce cases and other family law cases related to child custody, child support and property and debt division.

If you are looking for a reputable Dallas divorce lawyer or Dallas family attorney for a speedy and effective resolution of your family dispute, visit www.lawtolife.com and employ the service of the most competent Dallas lawyers.

Dallas Litigation

dallas litigation
Is there a lawyer in the Dallas, Fort Worth area that has experience in litigation against texas attorney gen.

Tried for years to collect back child support. We were only strung along by the state attorney generals office, now the child is over 18. Looking for a lawyer to retrieve my records, review and decide if we might have a case against them. There is a paper trail. We lost out on over 50,000.00 because of their negligence.

In Texas it is very difficult to prevail in a malpractice suit against a private attorney, it is virtually impossible to sue the attorney of the opposing party, and there a very few situtations where the Attorney General’s Office (or any of its Assistant Attorneys General) can be sued, because the attorneys general are agents of the state and are generally immune to civil suits. Individually they enjoy official immunity for acts done or omission in connection with their work.

Dallas Insurance Litigation Lawyer Plano Litigation Attorney

Dallas bankruptcy attorney

An injury can change your life forever. There are not only physical repercussions – you and your family may be struggling with the financial, mental, and emotional aftershock of that single moment in time. You may try to work through the event, but without finding a resolution regarding your injury, it is impossible to make any forward progress and move on with your life. The unbearable part is that you know the accident wasn’t your fault.Dallas bankruptcy attorney But even if your personal injury was due to someone else’s negligence, it might be difficult to know how to take action. With flashes of the accident lingering in your memory, and with the physical impacts of your injury still holding you back, it is often hard to pick up the pieces, find the help you need, and seek the justice that you deserve. At Fears | Nachawati, we have the ability to help you find peace with your personal injury. Not only are we dedicated to fighting for the justice you deserve, but we have the experience, knowledge and skills to pursue your case to the fullest extent of the law and bring justice and peace to you and your family. We are dependable, formidable, reputable, knowledgeable and accountable. While your head may still be spinning from the consequences of your accident and injury due to another person’s or a company’s negligence, we have the ability to take control of the situation and steer you toward a fair and honest resolution. In your difficult time, we pride ourselves on being available, trustworthy, and effective. Serving the people of Texas with offices in Austin, Dallas, Houston, Fort Worth, and San Antonio, Fears | Nachawati will fight for your rights in automobile accidents, 18-wheeler truck accidents, and motorcycle accidents. We handle wrongful death cases as well as spinal cord and brain injuries. Accidents happen. Even if you take all available precautions, the vast majority of Americans will be involved in a car accident during their lifetime. Whether you are driving your daughter to her softball practice on I-30 when you are struck by a drunk driver or whether you are making your way home after work on I-680 when you are hit by a large truck, sometimes there is little you can do to protect you and your family from the negligence of others. In Texas alone in 2006, there were almost 7,000 large truck and bus accidents that resulted in injury. Across the country in 2006, there were over 38,000 fatal crashes. At our firm, we see past these overwhelming statistics and devote ourselves to the faces and personal stories behind each and every accident. Enduring a personal injury or the wrongful death of a loved one can overwhelm you with confusion, anger, stress, and depression, and uncertainty. At Fears | Nachawati, our job is to lift the burden of your accident off of your shoulders and act as your advocate. We want to hold those responsible for your personal injury accountable for what they’ve done. Contingency Fee Representation and Free Consultations Dallas bankruptcy attorney At Fears | Nachawati, we understand that in the aftermath of your serious injury, you may not only be struggling financially, but also extremely unsure of your family’s financial security in the future. Because of this, we take on personal injury cases on a contingency fee basis. This means that we will pay the costs of litigation because have confidence in our skills and in your case. In the end, our attorney fee will come from the recovery you attain. If we are unable to attain compensation for you, you will owe us nothing for case expenses or attorney fees. In the same vein, we offer free consultations. If you have been injured in an accident and are unsure as to whether or not you have a case, talk to us. You may call us toll-free at (866) 705-7584 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (866) 705-7584 end_of_the_skype_highlighting or complete our contact form. You may also visit us at one of our Texas offices in Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth, San Antonio, and Austin. We also offer home and hospital visits.