Posts Tagged ‘funding’

Funding Litigation

funding litigation

How do I prove a trust fund exists?

My ex has receives income from a family trust fund, which I believe is set up as a “discretionary fund”. My attorney tells me that this counts as “income” and I am entitled to this money in the form of child support. The problem is that if I take him to court, the family will stop paying him, while there is litigation..ie: showing that he is NOT in fact receiving money.
Meanwhile, he is living large and I am gettting a small pittance in the way of chidl support. Any advice??

a Trust is registered at the government and has to file an income tax report just like a company or an individual. If your ex is receiving money from this Trust he has to declare it in his income tax. You can not hide money from a Trust, it’s managed by lawyers and each cent is accounted for. Ask your lawyer to revise your child support after the income tax season, if he has in fact received money from a Trust then your child support will be revised consequently.

Wastewater treatment plant back on track after last year show DOA plans to Pagosa Springs wastewater treatment plant has a new life as the pursuit of USDA funds the organization has just been cleared another hurdle.

Litigation Funding

litigation funding

Lawsuit Funding Options for You

Lawsuit funding has become increasingly popular amongst plaintiffs looking to extend their personal injury cases in hopes for larger settlements. Due to the downturn in the economy and recent job loss lawsuit funding is now becoming a more viable option. The plaintiffs that tend to use lawsuit funding as an option are those people who are strapped for cash and need help paying bills and out of pocket expenses prior to a legal case reaching a settlement.

Over the last few years, lawsuit funding has become a phenomena within the legal community. While many attorneys use lawsuit funding as a way to litigate class action lawsuits & large personal injury cases, many are advising their clients to investigate this option to help keep their case alive.  Due to the deep pockets of insurance companies and corporations, litigation can extend out for years before a verdict is reached. These companies have tenacious defense teams with deep pockets willing to hold up a verdict at all costs. Most companies will intentionally hold up a case in hopes for a lesser settlement. It is always recommended that a client never prematurely accept an offer without fully understanding the financial consequences at hand. An experienced personal injury attorney will advise his client to seek ongoing medical treatment prior to accepting a less offer.

When a company provides funding for a legal case the money does not come as a loan. Lawsuit funding is a financial arrangement between the lender or investment company and the plaintiff. A loan is defined as money that is borrowed by a person or company which will be paid back within a certain time period. Lawsuit funding is non recourse meaning money advanced to the plaintiff is contingent upon the outcome of the case. The lender cannot recover payments made if the client’s case is lost, and the client gets to keep the full amount of the advancement.

When a person decides to hire legal representation  to help fight for their legal battle they oftentimes have an arrangement to pay the attorney a contingent fee. This fee is typically a percentage of the winnings from the case. If the plaintiff wins the case, the personal injury attorney will be the first person to receive compensation. If a person decides to secure lawsuit funding as an option the lender would be the next in line to receive payment. The remainder of the monies left over would be paid directly to the plaintiff.

If the amount of money won by the plaintiff is less than what was borrowed, the finance company will receive the remaining amount of money, only after the attorney is paid their fee. The remainder balance is not paid back to the lender.

There four different lawsuit funding types include:

• Pre settlement funding
• Structured settlement funding
• Commercial litigation financing
• Law Firm loans

While alternative methods are preferred by some lawsuit funding is becoming a viable option within the legal industry.

Over the last few years, lawsuit funding has become a phenomena within the legal community. While many attorneys use lawsuit funding as a way to litigate class action lawsuits & large personal injury cases, many are advising their clients to investigate this option to help keep their case alive.  Due to the deep pockets of insurance companies and corporations, litigation can extend out for years before a verdict is reached. These companies have tenacious defense teams with deep pockets willing to hold up a verdict at all costs. Most companies will intentionally hold up a case in hopes for a lesser settlement. It is always recommended that a client never prematurely accept an offer without fully understanding the financial consequences at hand. An experienced personal injury attorney will advise his client to seek ongoing medical treatment prior to accepting a less offer.

When a company provides funding for a legal case the money does not come as a loan. Lawsuit funding is a financial arrangement between the lender or investment company and the plaintiff. A loan is defined as money that is borrowed by a person or company which will be paid back within a certain time period. Lawsuit funding is non recourse meaning money advanced to the plaintiff is contingent upon the outcome of the case. The lender cannot recover payments made if the client’s case is lost, and the client gets to keep the full amount of the advancement.

When a person decides to hire legal representation  to help fight for their legal battle they oftentimes have an arrangement to pay the attorney a contingent fee. This fee is typically a percentage of the winnings from the case. If the plaintiff wins the case, the personal injury attorney will be the first person to receive compensation. If a person decides to secure lawsuit funding as an option the lender would be the next in line to receive payment. The remainder of the monies left over would be paid directly to the plaintiff.

If the amount of money won by the plaintiff is less than what was borrowed, the finance company will receive the remaining amount of money, only after the attorney is paid their fee. The remainder balance is not paid back to the lender.

There four different lawsuit funding types include:

• Pre settlement funding
• Structured settlement funding
• Commercial litigation financing
• Law Firm loans

While alternative methods are preferred by some a settlement loan is becoming a viable option within the legal industry.

About the Author

LawLeaf is an online Lawsuit Funding service that matches plaintiffs with lenders. If you are interested in lawsuit funding and would like our lenders to compete for your business, visit LawLeaf.com today.

Why should immigrants be entitled to receive legal aid funding ?

It saddens me thinking of the chicken in a basket style solicitors that are cleaning up on legal aid when dealing with immigrants – I believe solicitors are milking the uk court system for ££££’s in long winded litigation, appeals etc

no they shouldn’t i only think you should get legal aid if you were born here

Litigation Financing Company

litigation financing company
Am I the only stay at home mom with this problem?

I am a stay at home mommy not only by choice but stay at home by default as well. I was in a terrible car accident 3 years ago that left me with nerve damage in my right arm and unable to work. I struggle with certain things and do house work at my own pace but ALWAYS, ALWAYS my home is spotless and little boy is healthy and happy. My husband works a good job, but financally we have been taken to our knees from my accident. (Still in litigation with the insurance company of the Tractor Trailer truck that hit me) I know that there is much stress in our marriage dealing with finances. Before the accident we always had. Now – we make it, but struggle. It just seems that my husband has no clue nor cares how hard I work making our house a home and raising our son. He comes home, does yard work occassionally and watches tv. Never really does anything to help, just tells me when ‘the dryer went off’… or my son has a dirty diaper. He seems self-centered since my accident. Help?

I dont have any real answers for you. I am in the same situation. I have a nuerological disorder similiar to cp. I was in real good shape when I had my daughter who is now sixteen. My husband and I decided to have more children recently. There is an age gap of 13 and 15 years between my children. I know have three. One is 3 years old and one is 21 months old. My husband told me he would help. But, when comes home from work he sits on the couch and watches tv. Also, like your husband he does the yard work. My house is not spotless, but I try. I am doing all I can. Unless I specifically ask him to do something and then he seems put out, but he does it. I have talked to him about it. He says to just ask and he will do it. But, when I ask it is in a minute and that minute never comes or he does it, but you can tell he dont want too. I am much slower at getting things done and try my best to everything. When you come up with an answer let me know. My husband has never bathed the children. Although he does change a few diapers (very few). If I am away or something. He wants me the way I used to be. I will never be that. I know it causes me to resent him when I am so busy and frankly he sits on his ass. I dont know what to do. I do love him. I just dont know. Edit. I know I did not answer you question but I thought it might help to know you are not alone.

New York Ethical Lawsuit Funding Company LawCash

Lawsuit Loans Allow Personal Injury Litigants To Pursue Full Compensation

Sometimes, this is because they don’t have the money to pursue their claim through to the end.  Litigation financing companies offer relief in these types of instances, so that you can stay afloat until your case reaches a verdict.

Depending upon how serious your injuries are, you may be unable to work for a few weeks, or you may be disabled.  You can no longer work.  How will the bills get paid?  Pre-settlement funding gives you the money you need to pay monthly household bills, medical costs, attorney fees and more.  No doubt you will have a great deal of medical expenses, and perhaps expenses for rehabilitation as well.  How can you continue your claim, which may last for months when your income supply is gone?  You can’t.  This is exactly what lawsuit loans are for.

You may be thinking “but this won’t work for me. I already have enough bills, I can’t afford another monthly payment for a loan.”  This is where pre-settlement funding differs from regular bank loans.  There is no credit check, no hassle, and you do not repay the money until you win your lawsuit.  You pay the litigation financing company absolutely nothing until you receive your money!  But, what if something goes awry and you end up losing?  That is the best thing about lawsuit loans.  If you do not win, you do not pay.  

No doubt you have heard about people settling out of court.  While this may be fine in some cases, often it means the plaintiff gets an amount that is substantially less than what they deserve.  You do not have to put up with accepting less than you are entitled to from insurance companies.  You can fight the defendants, even if they are a large corporation or company!  Pre-settlement funding gives you the necessary funds so that you can concentrate on winning your case, and worry less about how you are going to pay your monthly obligations.

Speak with your attorney about lawsuit loans, and what litigation financing companies may be able to do for you.  The process is simple, there is very little paperwork involved, and you will get your money the same or very next day if you qualify.  You deserve every dime you have coming for the injuries, pain and suffering, and loss of income you have endured.  Pre-settlement funding is beneficial for many litigants; it may also be the perfect answer to your dilemma.

Litigation Funding

litigation funding
Insurance company wants a signed release for them as well as the insured before releasing funds, is this legal

My husband was t-boned by a drugged out kid. The kid’s parent’s insurance will not release the $15,000 personal injury limit from their policy until a release is signed releasing the company as well as the insureds as individuals for future or further litigation. I can understand holding the insurance company harmless for future claims. But the individuals??? My husband currently has numerous six figure hospital bills, is facing more surgeries, will never be able to work at his trade again, and I won’t even talk about spousal relations… How can the company demand that we release these people before paying us?
Don’t bother telling me to get an attorney. We have one, and he’s more worthless than the nipples on my stud horse.
I’m looking for an organization that’s currently working on insurance reform.
Really, I’m looking for a time machine – so I can get my real life back…
Any advice? Been in a similar situation? Any response appreciated…

The Insurance company’s legal obligation is to protect their insured. They’d be violating that obligation if they threw in their money without any effort to protect their customer. Complete release is the condition of their offer. If you want to go after the kid or his parents for more, don’t sign it. You’ll have to file suit. The insurer will probably ultimately kick in their limit, but you likely won’t be able to collect it until your law suit is either settled or gone to judgment or the defendant has filed for bankrupotcy protection. There are some other twists & options, depending on state law & your particular situation, but nothing that’s gonna make things much different. If you want to max out, you gotta be patient.

New Law Journal Newscast – Third Party Litigation Funding s

Lawsuit Loan! Risk Free Lawsuit Funding!!

Lawsuit Loan! Risk Free Lawsuit Funding!!

Lawsuit Cash Advance. No Risk Funds.

99% of Plaintiffs involved in Lawsuits Don’t Realize They Can get Cash Advance before their Case Settles. It is called lawsuit funding or often referred as “Lawsuit loans”,
“Litigation financing”, ” Legal financing,” or a “Lawsuit cash advance” or “Injury loans”, but these are not loans because the money does not have to be paid back unless the case is won or settled.

These are Non- Recourse Cash Advances. It carries No Risk because Plaintiffs owe Nothing if they lose the case. The client must be represented by an Attorney, and need money prior to settlement due to financial hardship.

Lawsuit Cash Advances or so called Lawsuit Loans can provide a very timely financial solution to help plaintiffs who are having financial difficulties. Usually the Plaintiff’s financial hardship is the result of being injured and not being able to work.

Mostly plaintiffs have missed work or lost their job and can no longer meet their mortgage/ rent or car payments. Many of them may be one or two payments away from Foreclosures. They may be in need of Medical treatments. They need to pay Children’s education expenses.

But now this new Lawsuit or Litigation Funding is great help to plaintiffs. In the past, these claimants have needed to accept lesser settlement amounts due to pressing financial difficulties. Now, clients can sustain their personal lives and give the attorney the necessary time to achieve the full value of the case.

Lawsuit Funding: How does it work? This total process is confidential, prompt and discreet. The process to receive Lawsuit Cash Advance is Risk Free & simple. Plaintiff may have a bad or no credit. There are no monthly payments.

1. The first step is to complete an Application Form.
   Making an application is free and there is no obligation
2. Plaintiff authorizes attorney to release case information to underwriters
3. Quick and thorough underwriting process to qualify client.
4. If approved Plaintiff completes funding agreement
5. Bank check delivered to Plaintiff
6. Plaintiff payback upon successful settlement/verdict of case
7. If Plaintiff loses case, Plaintiff owes nothing to funding company

Lawsuit pre-settlement cash advance is available for:

• Personal Injury, Automobile Accidents, Pedestrian injury any Type
• Pharmaceutical Litigation like Zyprexa, Vioxx, and Fen-phen etc.
• Asbestos / Mesothelioma lawsuit
• Tobacco/Smoking cases
• Slip & Fall Cases, Burn Injuries
• Nursing Home Abuses
• Breach of Contract
• Class Action/Product Liability
• Employment Discrimination
• Judgments, Verdicts, Appeals
• Malpractice: Medical-Legal, Accounting, Construction etc.
• Harassment: Sexual/Rape, Any Type
• Workers Comp. cases (not in all the states)
• Wrongful Termination
• Wrongful Death
• Patent or Copyright infringement & other Intellectual Property

• Real Estate Disputes

  AND MANY MORE…..

A lot of people & businesses are being forced to settle early for way less than they deserve because they simply can’t afford to wait any longer. There is no reason for them to settle for less than their case is worth.

There are some good internet sites that give more information on lawsuit cash advances. One good source of information is http://www.easylawsuitfunding.com They also offer Lawsuit Funding for all the cases and their services are nationwide (except Ohio).

Incoming search terms for the article:

• does lawsuit settlement funding companies ever lose
• lawsuitcashadvancebrokerswanted

Litigation Funding Insurance

litigation funding insurance

Is the Media Afraid of Christine Lasala and the Wtc Insurance Fund?

A general theme that I’ve tried to make over the last several posts is that not only are Christine LaSala and the WTC Insurance Fund squandering the $1 Billion they were granted by Congress and negligently allowing the health of WTC rescue workers to deteriorate, but also that the media has hardly reported these events. Certainly the inner workings of complex tort litigation isn’t the first thing that people want to read in the morning paper, but with the memories of 9/11 so fresh in the minds of all Americans, but especially New Yorkers, you would think more attention would be paid to the plight of the rescue workers and of the WTC Insurance Fund and how Christine LaSala has run it.

Instead, Christine LaSala has essentially gotten a pass from the mainstream media as she has siphoned $350,000 per year from the WTC Insurance Fund and paid countless millions to other attorneys to try to deny the claims of the WTC rescue workers that the WTC Insurance Fund was designed to assist. As I mentioned, thanks to the good work of the law firm of Napoli & Bern on behalf of the WTC rescue workers, on April 1 Congress will be holding hearings to inquire into how Christine LaSala has been managing the WTC Insurance Fund. Besides the publicity that Napoli & Bern have received for defending these American heroes, there have been a scant few reporters who have been investigating this story since the beginning. Susan Edelman of the New York Post has written a number of stories that paint a clear picture of how little the WTC rescue workers have received, especially in comparison to how much money Christine LaSala has “earned†from the WTC Insurance Fund. Her story from the fall of 2006 (http://www.nypost.com/seven/10152006/news/regionalnews/350g_paycheck_for_citys_9_11_scrooge_regionalnews_susan_edelman.htm) really illustrates the sham that Christine LaSala is perpetrating in the name of the WTC rescue workers. Besides Edelman who’s written a couple of stories, recently Napoli & Bern were featured in the New York Times coinciding with this week’s hearings in Washington D.C. It is my hope that the Times’ piece and these hearings raise some public consciousness of what Christine LaSala has been doing (or mostly not doing).

However, a few newspaper articles and a Congressional hearing won’t be at the forefront of the media’s attention with an upcoming election and a possible recession. Because of this, Christine LaSala can continue to earn well over a quarter-million dollars per year and fight against the WTC rescue workers unchecked. Beyond the inherent media issues, I think part of the problem is that many New Yorkers have been eager to put the awful memories of 9/11 out of their minds and presume that all the promises made by the likes of Giuliani, Bloomberg and those in the federal government were kept. Sure we hear stories on the news every night about individuals with serious health problems after working at Ground Zero, but the money that was designated for these victims has vanished under Christine LaSala’s watch and the average New Yorker is unaware of that. It’s a fraud so audacious that the media and public have basically ignored the story because it’s so hard to believe that after the tragedy of 9/11 that so many taxpayer dollars could be misspent.